Clase abierta: Economic Analysis of Good Faith in Civil Law Systems

Lunes 18 de Noviembre, 09.50h.

Ejan Mackaay
Emeritus Professor of Law
Université de Montréal

Abstract: Good faith appears at once as a fundamental concept in all civil law systems, with a long history, and yet as one whose nature and contents are ill-understood and controversial. The paper is an attempt to find out whether the economic analysis of law can shed new light on it and help to clarify it. Good faith is used in two distinct senses, which traditional legal scholarship has identified as subjective and objective. In its subjective sense, good faith as justifiable ignorance of a relevant legal situation refers to having taken adequate precautions against such ignorance, the adequacy being a function of what is at stake and the likelihood of misapprehension. This is reminiscent of the logic of accident and accident prevention law developed in the economic analysis of tort or civil liability law. 
In the objective sense of not taking advantage, good faith is analysed as the exact opposite of opportunism. On opportunism there is a reasonably well-developed economic literature. Reciprocal gain, the founding concept of contract and of extensions such as the law of business enterprise, presupposes the absence of opportunism. Good faith in this sense may be said to underlie all of contract law. Human nature being what it is, some individuals may be tempted by opportunistic acts and their potential victims are led to take costly precautions to guard against it. Law can make itself useful by providing safeguards against opportunism that are less costly than what contracting parties themselves can come up with. Together, these safeguards have to be as wide-ranging as is opportunism itself, yet individually they have to be specific enough to ensure legal certainty. Good faith itself remains as a broad residual concept, to be applied sparingly, in situations on which the specific concepts provide no proper grip. Yet at the same time good faith, being the quintessential anti-opportunism concept, underlies all the more specific concepts one finds in the Codes and allows one to see their unity. On a different level, an understanding of opportunism focuses attention on acts and facts that may be relevant in concrete novel situations to be judged by a court, where opportunism may be an issue. 
Economic analysis of law allows one to make sense of good faith in a meaningful way, thus contributing to legal scholarship.

E. Mackaay: LL.M (Amsterdam), LL.M (Toronto), LL.D (Amsterdam). Over the years, my research has always been at the interface between law and neighbouring sciences, in particular computing science (computers and law; artificial intelligence and law; internet law) and the social sciences ("jurimetrics", law and economics). Currently my research interests lie principally in the economic analysis of law and in intellectual property. The economic analysis of law proposes an new reading of legal rules across fields of law to show their raison d'être and their underlying unity. It has been an important source of renewal in legal scholarship over the past quarter century. The economic analysis of law has come off to a slow start in French-speaking countries, contrary to what happened in several other legal cultures. My objective is to contribute significantly to the take-off of this approach in French-speaking legal cultures and to ensure a prime place to CRDP in this development. (VER MAS)


Lugar: Campus Alcorta: Av. Figueroa Alcorta 7350, Ciudad de Buenos Aires.
Contacto: Escuela de Derecho

Organiza: Escuela de Derecho